Exploring Human Relationships: EVA, Wu Qi & Tang Biao

Morning, I listened to an episode of EVA (which had been mentioned in my blog post titled Komm, ssser Tod ). In the evening, I watched a conversation between Wu Qi and Tang Biao (see Wu ). It seems that they are discussing the same theme: how to handle relationships with others in contemporary life. The character with an unknown origin, , appears to be unnecessary and plays a role similar to a shadow of the real world within this fictional universe (a world entirely projected from one’s inner mind).

The question of human relationships always comes up on my mental agenda. Whether it’s the strong bonds of close friendships or the weaker connections like nearness mentioned by Tang Biao, both are relevant in EVA. The latter, for example, involves interactions between Tang Biao and his neighbors such as Third Village residents. Upon reflection, this aspect seems more significant because it reflects Tang Biao’s limited involvement with labor in Third Village. Without these experiences, he might remain socially isolated, unable to resolve his fear of (a close female friend) stemming from deep-seated insecurities.

There’s something wrong with overly emphasizing profound and intimate relationships based solely on emotional closeness. This approach is problematic when it’s confined to intimacy alone. Building deeper connections can come through shared activities like labor or collaboration, whereas superficial interactions often lack depth. Deep conversations may sometimes feel like mere superficial exchanges, similar to looking in a mirror.

The foundation of meaningful and constructive conversations lies in expressing the tangential emotions and confusions we carry, rooted in our biological nature and personal histories. These feelings of isolation and unappreciation can confirm our existence but also open the door to exploring works like EVA, which offer deeper insights into ourselves through their narrative structures.

True is fearful of authenticity because any interaction with others might destabilize his projections. This fear stems from his reliance on introspection in a world where he seems unable to connect with others meaningfully. We fear being misunderstood and our thoughts might be critiqued or trivialized, but these aspects are integral to the spiritual field , which exists beyond individual experience.

Understanding this doesn’t negate the need to address our desires. Engaging in conversations, especially face-to-face interactions, can satisfy some of these needs. However, many of our desires remain unmet, leading us to explore and create continuously. If we were to completely replace talking with other means of satisfying desires, it would risk losing what makes life fulfillingwithout the ability to connect with others or reflect on ideas.

The persistence of unsatisfied desires pushes us to seek deeper meaning in life. A moment of complete satisfaction leads to stagnation as there’s nothing more to explore or create. This is a paradox since we strive for fulfillment but rely on temporary moments of contentment, which hinder our progress and growth. The more desires remain unmet, the greater the urge to connect with others through shared experiences and resonances.

This phenomenon also highlights the depth of human natureour need to interact and resonate with others even when satisfaction is elusive. It’s a way to avoid boredom by engaging in activities that challenge us and foster growth.