Theatrical Version: Oscuro Camp

Oscuro Camp theatrical version

The story takes place in early winter.

Mitsuho Kinako leaves her hometown, Yashiro, and works as an editor at a small publishing house in Nagoya alone. She lives by herself. One weekend evening, after planning to ride her electric bike out for a spin, she receives a text from her former friend, Megu Sato: I’m right here in Nagoya now.

Megu is Kinako’s high school friend and works as an assistant in the promotional division of a travel agency in Yashiro. She is currently handling a major project to revitalize a formeredylosed facility from five years ago. We have this vast open space; why not turn it into a camp site? Kinako remarks off-handedly about her suggestion, which prompts Megu to take action.

The other members of the project include:

• Aoi Akira (Oscuro) works as an assistant in an outdoor goods store in Tokyo,

• Yuki Nisei (Otsukaresu) teaches elementary school English in her hometown and is currently a staff member at a pet grooming shop in Saitama,

Mitsuho Kinako (Hoshino) is a writer who runs a blog called “Oscuro Camp,” and Mayue Yuki (Sakuraporter) works as a social worker for an animal rescue organization in Yashiro.

Along with these four friends, former club members from high school have come together to develop the camp site. These five people, who were connected through their love of , are now tackling things they once thought impossiblechallenges that test their ability to adapt and grow. The story of these outdoor-spirited young women is just beginning.

As a theatrical version, this film reflects the team’s financial struggles. While there are many unnecessary elements in terms of storyline, for half-fans like me, it provides an enjoyable viewing experiencesomething relaxing and stress-free. It depicts how former JK fans have become normal people after leaving their passion behind while juggling work and other hobbies. Megu still refers to her former friends as “Oscuro” even though they’ve grown into adulthood and are no longer part of the club. Moreover, she sees them develop into a large-scale project with social functions. It’s truly inspiring.

Before watching (https://bangumi.tv/subject/1424) , I thought that girls’ worlds were unchangingthings we worry about changing but also fear change, holding onto the hope of things never altering. But in reality, change comes unexpectedly. Three years later and now as adults, we’re still following our old routines without realizing it. We’ve made ourselves at home, met new friends and loved ones, bought tiny apartments, filled them with all sorts of small objects we love, and stuffed our heads full of social responsibilities, plans, schedules, and listswords like “idealism,” “moral code,” and “argument.” The sky has gone gray, the land has become heavy, and the real things hurt us shape us twist us. How do idealistic thoughts change? Let’s look at the five-member group from this film. Despite being juggling many -related problems now, they still retain a lot of similarities with their high school selves. This unchanging aspect is what makes them so speciala kind of character design that fits into their category as literary characters or the fundamental principles they’ve always believed in. I would call it both a “character design” and a “principle” in growth, especially for Megu who has a carefree but always cheerful personalitythis represents the highest level of human nature.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of her lifestyle now.

In high school , we were taught about flat characters and round characters. Flat characters are more like dramatic characters, while round ones are more complex and multi-dimensional. Although I prefer flat characters better now because they’re simpler than the complexities of real life, I still feel that flat characters are easier to deal with when it comes to writing. In this film’s case, I think Megu is a kind of flat characteran idealized version of her character. Too simple to be complex, yet perfect for conveying the highest level of existential philosophy. As such, I can’t help but feel so envious of